How
Speaks History
Not “tomorrow is another day,” but “tomorrow is another
world” is what could be heard from Julien Temple’s documentary London: The Modern Babylon (2012). The
archival material used in the film is seductive. Its enchantment inspires the
viewer to wonder whether it owes the sense of naivety, exuding from nearly every
single frame, to the imagery so unmistakenly different from that to which one
is customarily exposed, or, to a sentiment entirely distinct from the modern
day one.
Likewise, as it to a great extent deals with the question of
diversity, especially in a multicultural society such as Britain, one wonders
whether the panoramic historical overview is suggestive of Richard Rorty’s ruminations
in Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (1989),
where he advances the belief that different vocabularies, synchronically and
diachronically alike, describe different worlds and are indicative of both the
vocabularies’ and the worlds’ incommensurability. If so, it may imply not only
certain incommunicability between and among the vocabularies and the worlds,
but within them, as well.
By contrast, one is prone to entertain the idea Stewart Home
presents in his novel Tainted Love (2005):
“The Times Change and We Change Too” (217 capitalization in original), coupled
with the thought from his exploration of the conversation between punk scenes
and culture at large entitled Cranked Up
Really High: Genre Theory and Punk Rock (1995):”We change and yet remain
the same” (122).
Such dilemmas imbue the meditation with an additional layer
of cultural critique, building upon what Temple suggests in the film. Clearly,
it is a recklessly commoditized, worryingly violent time portrayed there. The
Sex Pistols lyrics “pretty vacant” resonate with the footage of the August 2011
riots in several towns and cities in England, when the apex of the
revolutionary spirit manifested itself in random looting of the nearby
businesses. That may raise doubt about there being any pocket within cultural
realities left readily available to be used as a source of wholesome
resistance.
Dystopian as it may look, such a cultural climate may,
nevertheless, provide a glimpse of the world whose languages might not be
perfectly compatible, and yet, in accord with Home’s writing, in which humans
can still be capable of communicating, despite an erratic nature of
communicational content, hindrances in the communication channel, and / or
alternating cycles of noise and silence.