Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Out of Cacophony : Majestic Travesty of Storytelling from Darkness (Part 2/2)

How Modern Tradition Is : Sweet Music & the Remix

hic & nunc / anticarpe diem Suspension of Belief

Were Sweet Tooth a sonnet, it might be of a somewhat unusual structure. It would be characterized by an extended couplet, whose first verse opens with Serena’s starting to explore the world of T.H. Haley’s—soon to become a lover of hers—fiction (136). The other is a sort of coda in absentia (albeit not necessarily in the very literal sense) : Tom’s letter to his reader, crowning the novel with the mastery of mediation.

Excelling in reading, Serena not only perfects and solidifies the reliability of herself as the reader, but also enables the reader of the novel regain trust in the story despite the occasional, not always easy challenges. As for the writer’s letter, it turns out to be the most exquisite of narrative devices, as it simultaneously epitomizes the mediating role of epistolary form and, paradoxically, subverts mediated messages by re-establishing the centrality of immediacy as the source, the vehicle, and the basis of the mutual trust between the reader and the text.

However, the trustful reciprocity is not easily won. As the novel unfolds, or, rather, wraps into a labyrinth of mistrustful alleys, the reader is confronted with similar doubts the narrator-reader, Serena, faces. The reader of the novel might not necessarily be an MI5 employee. S/he does not have to fake her profession and present her/himself to her/his parents as a worker for the Department of Health and Social Security. S/he needs not be an agent on the Sweet Tooth mission. Likewise, s/he does not necessitate choosing an artist to be the recipient of the funds allegedly provided by the Foundation and distributed to the awardee via Freedom International, reportedly for the purpose of the promotion of freedom of speech. Ian McEwan, Sweet Tooth: “Woe to the nation whose literature is disturbed by the intervention of power” (98). None of these need not be part of the identity of the reader, but s/he may, nevertheless, sense the disguises, the doubt, the travesty.

The labyrinth in which no one trusts anyone and everyone doubts everybody else reverberates with contemporary cultural realities that call for disambiguation. The tone is indicative of certain aspects of such a culture. It is so strangely calmative that it seems quite impossible that such a sedating effect hides no surprises. And it does. The charm of the storytelling has the capacity to suck one into a blurry miasma of mixed boundaries, mistaken guesses, confusing assumptions: ”like a polyphonic chorus” (Sweet Tooth 114). The obfuscation renders the past decades translatable into the cultural vocabulary of the twenty-first century. A glimpse of the contrast between postwar austerity and economic rejuvenation, a portrayal of the sinister turn of the posthippie era that leaked into the recession of the seventies under a monstrous disguise of liberation bringing nationwide access to mind altering substances in the form of a status symbol, class rebellion, intellectual emancipation, sexual liberties, self-improvement, and/or source of income is not entirely different from contemporary cultural climate. There might be divergences in the redescription of power relations, mainstream, countercultures, and their crypto variants, but the core of the phenomenon – the use of drugs as a means of oppressive social control – is more or less the same.

The enchanting steadiness of the tone makes no effort to protect the reader from slight disruptions within the melliferous flow. Thankfully so. Otherwise, it would not be possible to suspend belief towards such a magnitude of cripplingly manipulative mechanisms. The soothing mellowness of the narration, despite the occasional dramatic moments, is by no means set to create a sense of an oneiric drift into an illusion of eternal carefreeness. On the contrary, it keeps and refines the reader’s sensitivity to the subtleties of storytelling : it offers choices between what is and what is not trustworthy. At times, everything is so suspicious that it resembles Haley’s story about Neil Carder. Plagued by ambiguity, it exudes the distrust informing quite a few among the aspects of contemporary culture: ”It seemed so unlikely that people were tempted to think it might even be true” (Sweet Tooth 137). Such an atmosphere of heightened doubt and suspension might be ascribed to the genre. Rightly so. Otherwise, there would be no signposts to distract the reader’s search for the clues along the erratic pathways.


Such a seeming climate of constant alertness might be evocative of the state of ceaseless anxiety, but the reader knows better. There are disruptions of a different kind in this narrative— interjections that reconsolidate the trust in the stability of the tone so pacifying that one might be tempted to doubt its authenticity. Sometimes, to endure noise in the communication channel it takes a bit of restlessness of Serena’s sleepless nights. Ian McEwan, Sweet Tooth: ”For most of the night I lay on my back with the covers pulled up to my chin, listening, thinking in circles, waiting for the dawn to come like a soothing mother and make things better” (80). And it does. It does so it feels like a nostalgic reminiscence of a cozy cottage in the country welcoming early summer sunshine so refreshing in gentleness that its smile inhabits the heart to cast its rays on whatever fallible context one might find oneself in.

No comments:

Post a Comment